Blog / Observability
A Complete Guide to OpenTelemetry
Step-by-Step Engineering Handbook for Every Skill Level

OpenTelemetry is the CNCF's vendor-neutral framework for collecting traces, metrics and logs. This guide covers what it is, where it pays off and what it costs, then the deployment decisions that matter: daemon versus gateway collectors, memory buffers, resource attributes, semantic conventions, SDK rollout, head versus tail sampling and pipeline transformers, plus a five-step quick start.
This guide folds in two earlier posts: What Is OpenTelemetry? by Pankaj Thakkar and our OpenTelemetry Quick Start Guide.
OpenTelemetry is a powerful framework for monitoring software systems. It helps you collect and process telemetry data like logs, metrics, and traces. We created this guide to take you through key aspects of deploying and configuring OpenTelemetry, including deployment modes, memory buffers, resource decorators, semantic conventions, SDK deployment, sampling methods, and pipeline transformers.
What is OpenTelemetry (OTel)?
OpenTelemetry is an open-source observability framework designed to provide a unified approach for collecting and managing telemetry data, including traces, metrics, and logs, and upcoming real user monitoring and continuous profiling. It enables developers to instrument their applications for monitoring and debugging, offering a standard way to capture and export this data to various observability backends.
What are the benefits of OpenTelemetry?
OpenTelemetry offers a range of benefits that enhance observability and monitoring. Here are some key advantages:
- Vendor-Neutral: OpenTelemetry is an open-source project governed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF). It is designed to be vendor-neutral, allowing organizations to avoid vendor lock-in.
- Unified Observability Framework: OpenTelemetry provides a consistent framework for collecting metrics, traces, and logs, and correlating them, which creates a unified, holistic view of system or application performance.
- Standardization and Interoperability: By adhering to industry standards, OpenTelemetry provides consistency and interoperability, facilitating easier integration with different systems.
- Rich Ecosystem and Community Support: OpenTelemetry has an active community, which means continuous improvements, documentation, and a wealth of shared knowledge.
- Customizable and Extensible: OpenTelemetry is customizable and can be extended to meet specific needs and use cases.
- Instrumentation Across Many Languages: OpenTelemetry offers libraries and SDKs for various programming languages, making it easier to instrument code for observability.
According to the latest survey, OpenTelemetry now has over 9,000 contributors from more than 1,100 companies.
While OpenTelemetry offers considerable advantages, understanding its capabilities, challenges, and potential pitfalls is crucial. Let’s delve into some of the costs and considerations associated with implementing OpenTelemetry.
What are the costs and considerations of OpenTelemetry?
Despite its many advantages, implementing OpenTelemetry comes with its own set of challenges. Fortunately, the OpenTelemetry community and committed vendors like Kloudfuse are actively working to tackle these issues. Some of the key challenges include:
- Complexity and Learning Curve: Setting up OpenTelemetry involves configuring collectors, agents and exporters, which can be complex, especially when integrating OTel with other tools and across metrics, traces, and logs.
- Maintenance and Upgrades: As OpenTelemetry evolves, keeping up with updates, maintaining code configurations, ensuring compatibility with other tools and systems can require ongoing effort.
- Resource Usage and Latency: Collecting and exporting telemetry data can introduce some performance issues. The impact depends on the volume of data, the frequency of collection, and the type of configuration. Also, depending on the setup, there could be latency in data collection and transmission, which might affect real-time monitoring capabilities.
- Maturity: While the ecosystem around OpenTelemetry is growing, it might still be less mature compared to established observability solutions. This can mean that certain features might be less polished or less thoroughly tested, and there may be gaps in documentation or community resources.
- Integration Challenges: Integrating OpenTelemetry with existing systems and observability tools can be challenging, especially if those systems use different data formats or code bases.
- Vendor Lock-in: While OpenTelemetry is designed to be vendor-agnostic, the experience of integrating with different observability platforms can vary. Some vendors enhance OpenTelemetry with additional features, potentially leading to lock-in with specific platforms.
Despite these drawbacks, OpenTelemetry remains a robust and valuable tool for observability, and ongoing improvements and community contributions continue to address many of these challenges.
1. Which OpenTelemetry deployment mode should you choose: daemon or gateway?
In daemon mode, the OpenTelemetry Collector runs as a background service on the same host or container as the application it monitors, collecting, processing, and exporting telemetry data locally before sending it to your observability platform.
In contrast, gateway mode involves running the OpenTelemetry Collector as a centralized service or set of services that collect, process, and export telemetry data from multiple sources to a centralized backend.
Depending on your observability needs and constraints, you can choose between daemon and gateway deployment modes. Here’s a brief comparison:

By evaluating these factors, you can choose the deployment mode that best aligns with your architecture, scaling needs, and operational preferences.
2. How do you optimize memory buffers in OpenTelemetry?
Memory buffers in the OpenTelemetry Collector temporarily hold data before it’s processed or sent to your observability platform. Setting these buffers correctly is important to manage data flow and prevent performance issues, especially during spikes in data volume.
Best Practices in Setting up Memory Buffers:
- Size Buffers Based on Data Volumes: Analyze the volume and patterns of telemetry data generated by your applications and set appropriate buffer sizes that can handle peak loads without data loss.
- Balance Memory Use: Larger buffers can hold more data but use more memory. Avoid setting buffers too large, as it can slow down your system.
- Reduce Latency: For real-time data, use smaller buffers to ensure quick processing and exporting of data.
- Separate Buffers for Different Data Types: Use different buffers for metrics, logs, and traces. For example, use a 5 MB buffer for metrics (which come in small, frequent bursts) and a 10 MB buffer for traces (which are larger but less frequent).
- Monitor and Adjust: Keep an eye on buffer levels and latency. If buffers are often full or data processing is slow, consider increasing buffer sizes or tweaking data collection settings.
3. How do you add context to telemetry data with resource decorators?
Resource decorators add metadata to your telemetry data, like the hostname, application name, or environment (e.g., production or staging). This extra context helps you better understand and analyze your data, making it easier to diagnose issues and improve your system’s performance.
Best Practices for Implementing Resource Decorators in OpenTelemetry:
- Define Clear Metadata: Choose essential details like environment (e.g., production, staging), application name, and version. Make sure this metadata is consistent across all services for better analysis.
- Use Environment Variables: Set metadata using environment variables instead of hardcoding values. For example, use ${SERVICE_NAME} and ${ENVIRONMENT} to dynamically set metadata attributes based on where your application is running.
- Document and Communicate: Document the resource attributes being used, their purpose, and how they should be configured. This helps maintain consistency and makes it easier for new team members to understand.
4. How do semantic conventions create unified observability?
Semantic conventions help keep your telemetry data consistent and meaningful, making it easier to use with different systems and tools. Here’s why they’re important:
- Standardization: Using these conventions ensures that the telemetry data is understandable and consistent with other systems that follow the same conventions.
- Interoperability: By adhering to these conventions, different monitoring and observability tools can work together more effectively, as they understand the same data structures and meanings. Additionally, tools that visualize or analyze traces can use these attributes to provide insights without requiring custom parsing or mapping.
- Analysis and Troubleshooting: Consistent naming and attributes enable easier filtering, grouping, and analysis of traces, making it simpler to diagnose performance issues or errors. Example: For tracking user login events, use a trace span named "user-login" with attributes like user.id, login.success, and login.time. If a user with ID "789" logs in successfully at "2024-09-17T10:00:00Z", you would set: This standardization makes it easy to monitor and analyze login events across different systems.
5. How do you deploy OpenTelemetry SDKs successfully?
Deploying OpenTelemetry (OTel) SDKs can greatly enhance your application's observability, but it's important to get the setup right. Here are some simple tips to help you deploy OTel SDKs effectively:
- Check Language Support and Compatibility Make sure the OTel SDK supports your programming languages (like Java, Python, JavaScript, C++, or Go) and works with your library versions. For instance, if you use Java 11, make sure the SDK is compatible.
- Choose Your Instrumentation Type Automatic Instrumentation: The OTel SDK or agent automatically captures telemetry data without requiring changes to the application code. For example, the OpenTelemetry Java SDK can automatically instrument Java applications. Manual Instrumentation: You need to add code to your application to collect metrics, traces, and logs. For example, you might need to manually add instrumentation to specific functions or classes in a C++ or GO application.
- Configure Exporters Configure exporters to ensure that your telemetry data (traces, metrics, logs) is sent to the observability backend of your choice, such as Kloudfuse, Jaeger, or Prometheus. By following these tips, you'll set yourself up for success with OpenTelemetry SDKs and gain valuable insights into your applications.
6. Should you use tail sampling or head sampling in OpenTelemetry?
Sampling is a way to manage large amounts of telemetry data by selectively capturing a representative subset of trace data. There are two main methods: head sampling and tail sampling.
Head sampling decides whether to collect a trace at the start, based on set rules. It’s easier to use and has less impact on performance, but it might miss important traces if the initial rules aren't good enough.

Tail sampling waits until the trace is finished to decide if it should be kept, looking at all the data. This method is more flexible and can capture more complete information, but it requires more resources and is harder to implement.
7. What do pipeline transformers do for data enrichment, filtering and compliance?
Telemetry data often has a lot of noise, making it difficult to identify useful information. To filter out this noise and gain meaningful insights, OpenTelemetry offers a Pipeline Transformer that allows you to modify telemetry data before it is sent to your observability solution.
Here are some key areas why you might want to use a transformer in your OpenTelemetry pipeline:
- Data Enrichment: Data enrichment allows you to add context to your telemetry. Data enrichment lets you add context to your telemetry. For instance, if you want to track the application version in both development and production, you can include it as an attribute. You can do this with a simple configuration: upsert: { "application.version": "1.2.3" }. This attaches the version "1.2.3" to each span.
- Data Filtering: Transformers allow you to filter out unnecessary or sensitive information. For example, using processors: filter: metrics: - metric_names: ["*"] condition: "metric_value > 10000" filters out metrics with values over 10,000, while processors: filter: traces: - span_duration: "10s" condition: "duration > 10s" removes spans longer than 10 seconds.
- Data Transformation: You might need to reformat or aggregate data to match the schema or requirements of different backends. For example, you may want to convert all Unix timestamps to ISO 8601 format with processors: attributes: actions: - action: update key: "start_time" value: "timestamp_to_iso8601(start_time)".
- Anonymization and Redaction: To ensure compliance with privacy regulations, transformers can be used to anonymize or redact sensitive information before it leaves your environment. For instance, sensitive data like user IDs can be redacted with processors: attributes: actions: - action: redact key: "user_id" value: "[REDACTED]".
As we’ve explored in this guide, OpenTelemetry provides a comprehensive framework for monitoring and observability, enabling you to effectively collect and analyze telemetry data from your applications. By understanding the nuances of deployment modes, memory buffers, resource decorators, semantic conventions, and sampling techniques you can significantly enhance the insights gained from your telemetry data.
How do you get started with OpenTelemetry in five steps?
If you're looking to enhance your observability strategy, OpenTelemetry (Otel) is a fantastic place to start. Here’s a quick guide to get you up and running in no time!
1. Start with a Demo
Before diving in, familiarize yourself with Otel by exploring the playground. This interactive environment allows you to see how OpenTelemetry works in real-time, helping you understand its capabilities and benefits. The Kloudfuse demo playground is built on the OpenTelemetry demo, allowing anyone to easily set up the OpenTelemetry environment. You can try it out for free forever using the Kloudfuse single-node setup!
2. Install OpenTelemetry Collectors
Next, install the OpenTelemetry collectors. You can find the installation guide on GitHub. You have the flexibility to install just one collector to coexist with your existing observability tools or set up all streams from OpenTelemetry for comprehensive monitoring.
3. Utilize the SDK
Make sure to integrate the latest OpenTelemetry SDKs into your applications. Whether you choose automatic or manual instrumentation, the SDKs are designed to be compatible across different programming languages, making implementation straightforward.
4. Push Data to a Backend
Once your collectors are up and running, it's time to push your data to a backend. Consider using the free version of Kloudfuse to start collecting and analyzing your telemetry data effortlessly.
5. Start Observing
Finally, push your data to the backend and begin monitoring your systems.
Once everything is up and running, you’ll be able to explore all the services, their interconnections, RED metrics, spans and traces, logs, and runtime metrics—complete with infrastructure tags for cloud and Kubernetes—all using Kloudfuse. For more details, check out the OpenTelemetry Documentation.
By following these five easy steps, you'll be well on your way to mastering OpenTelemetry and enhancing your observability practices. Happy monitoring!
Frequently Asked Questions
What is OpenTelemetry used for?
OpenTelemetry is an open-source observability framework for collecting and managing telemetry data: traces, metrics and logs, with real user monitoring and continuous profiling on the way. Developers use it to instrument applications in a standard way and export that data to the observability backend of their choice, such as Kloudfuse, Jaeger or Prometheus.
Is OpenTelemetry vendor-neutral?
Yes. OpenTelemetry is governed by the Cloud Native Computing Foundation (CNCF) and is designed to avoid vendor lock-in. One caveat from this guide: some vendors enhance OpenTelemetry with proprietary features, so the integration experience varies by platform and can still create lock-in.
What are the main drawbacks of OpenTelemetry?
The costs are a learning curve when configuring collectors, agents and exporters; ongoing maintenance and upgrades as the project evolves; resource usage and possible latency in collection; a maturing ecosystem with gaps in documentation; and integration work when existing systems use different data formats.
Should the OpenTelemetry Collector run in daemon or gateway mode?
In daemon mode the Collector runs on the same host or container as the application and processes data locally before export. In gateway mode it runs as a centralized service that collects from many sources. Choose based on your architecture, scaling needs and operational preferences; the comparison table in section 1 lists the trade-offs.
What is the difference between head sampling and tail sampling?
Head sampling decides whether to keep a trace at the start, based on fixed rules. It is simpler and cheaper but can miss important traces. Tail sampling waits until the trace completes and decides with all the data in hand, which captures more complete information but needs more resources and is harder to implement.
How quickly can you get started with OpenTelemetry?
Five steps: explore the Kloudfuse playground, which is built on the OpenTelemetry demo; install the Collector; add the SDKs to your applications with automatic or manual instrumentation; push data to a backend; and start observing services, RED metrics, traces, logs and runtime metrics with cloud and Kubernetes tags. For cluster-level monitoring, see our complete guide to Kubernetes monitoring.

